KEY ATTRACTIONS ON THE DARWIN HOP-ON HOP-OFF RED BUS - THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW ON-LINE INFORMATION LINKS
CAN ASSIST PROMOTE LOCAL TOURISM INITIATIVES - CLICK ON THE LOGO TO ACCESS THAT WEB-SITE
Home | Tour Stops | Summary Tour Stops | Tour Times | Buy Ticket | Tour Map | Disclaimer | Copyright
Home | Exec Sum | Intro | Importance Stds | Guidance E-Health Stds | Next Steps | Apx 1: Stds Orgs | Disclaimer | Copyright
IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST - IS MEDICARE GOING TO BE PRIVATISED OR ARE THE COSTS GOING TO ICT COMPANIES ?
On 01 Jul 2016 the "National E-Health Transistion Authority [NEHTA]" vested all its Assets
and Liabilities in the "Australian Digital Health Agency [ADHA]" ref ADHA Web-site
Here is the Blog of Dr David MORE MB PhD FACHI on "waste of money" with Australian E-Health Standards
SURELY TAX-PAYERS OF EACH STATE & TERRITORY ARE DUE A SHARE OF THE ASSETS IN PROPORTION TO THE FINANCE PROVIDED !
NATIONAL E-HEALTH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT - 3.2.1 CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE
1 CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE
Development of standards, technical specifications and supporting materials designed
to support national e-health capabilities will be based on and compliant with the WTO
Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards .
Standards development in e-health occurs within wider economic, social and legal
frameworks.
A Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards
is annexed to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Technical Barriers
to Trade.
Australia is a signatory to this Agreement and its companion document, the WTO
Agreement on Government Procurement .
These Agreements require the Australian Government to encourage other Government and
non-Government standardization bodies to comply with the Code of Good Practice .
Key elements of the Code of Good Practice include:
1 Transparency, including publishing the work program; and enabling all stakeholders
to access and comment on standards developed – including via public comment
periods of at least 60 days [ 16 ;
2 Making “every effort” to achieve consensus, including clear processes for reconciling
comments received;
3 Coordination/harmonisation of the work of national standardization bodies, to avoid
duplication or conflict;
4 Use of international standards, where they exist or their completion is imminent, in
preference to local developments;
5 Participating in the development of international standards, and not duplicating the
work of other standards agencies;
6 Focusing on specification of requirements based on performance rather than design or
descriptive characteristics [ 17 ]; and
7 Prompt publication of and non-discriminatory charging for standards.
The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade requires WTO Members to use relevant
international standards rather than developed local alternatives unless these are
demonstrated to be inappropriate in the proposed context [ 18 ].
In that case, the local alternative should document the reasons for inappropriateness.
This requirement is mirrored in the Agreement on Government Procurement [ 19 ].
Key elements of these principles are detailed in 3.2.1 - 3.2.5
3.2.1 Code of Good Practice
3.2.2 Consensus
3.2.3 Collaboration
3.2.4 NEHTA’s Involvement in Standards Development
3.2.5 Quality
Home | Exec Sum | Intro | Importance Stds | Guidance E-Health Stds | Next Steps | Apx 1: Stds Orgs | Disclaimer | Copyright
<
Flag Counter