17:33 Mon 16 Dec 2002							REF:2C9ACBN2       

TO:	Roger JAYASUNDARA 		cc	LGov-NSW Respondents
	Project Director			NSW Local Goverment Syndicate respondents        
	Online Services Delivery       		Rate Payers
	LGOV-NSW       

LOCAL GOVERNMENT DE-CENTRALISED E-BUSINESS SERVICES COMPARED WITH CENTRALISED E-PROCUREMENT

This is an open e-mail to Lgov-NSW to consider conducting a series of Benchmarks to evaluate
a decentralised networked e-Business solution for each Council rather than separate 
Centralised e-Services and e-Procurement modules for the Lgov-NSW local-e tender.

This open e-mail is from the OIC Lgov-NSW Local-e Technical Committee comprising:

A	Guy BLOMBERG	Chair
B	Stephen GOULD
C	Ken BROMFIELD
D	Lars SORHUS
E	Larry WILSON 

Credentials of Committee

A	Guy BLOMBERG
 
1	1987 Involved in developing an Electronic Communication Infrastructure for updating 
	historical databases in the Australian Insurance Industry

2	1988 developed a prototype system for Lloyds of London Press and the Australian
	Association of Port and Marine Authorities based on the United Nations Port
	Management Information System [PORTMIS] requirement

3	1994 Developed OIC Electronic Association Information Management [EAIM] database
	application prototype

4	1998 Developed OIC Y2K Resource Asset Management [OICY2KRAMP] e-Commerce process that 
	won first prize in Global Bangemann Challenge - trophy presented to Guy BLOMBERG by 
	the King of Sweden in June 1999

5	2001 Developed Standard XML Tender Schema submitted to ebXML Australia

6	2002 Develop Active Server Page applications for Small & Medium size Enterprises
	E-business Management Services

B	Stephen GOULD

1	Burroughs National Sales Manager B80 Financial Industry (UK) and Director Office 
	Automation (Australia)

2	Established WICAT Computer Based Training company with Lionel Singer ex Managing 
	Director Prime Computer

3	Commissioned by Data General to develop Office Automation strategy for Australian 
	Insurance Industry

4	Three years research into Electronic Information Communication and Filing System

5	Attended 10 Electronic Data Interchange Conferences between 1987-1991

6	Represented Australian Small Business Association on Australian EDI Standards
	Committee

7	Spent 2 years in Europe working on information communications projects with a number 
	of oranisations involved with enhancing communications between members including the
	British	Standards Institute [BSI], The European Aerospace Association [AECMA],
	EU Customs and the UK Institute of Electrical Engineers

8	Recognised by IBM UK as a world expert in E-Commerce

9	Represents the OIC on ebXML Australia Committee

C	Ken BROMFIELD

1	Principal of the Indigo School of Graphics

2	OIC Inaugural Webmaster

3	Managing Director OTMG Pty Ltd that provides the TenderInformation
	Management Service [TIMS]

4	Chair of the OIC Local Government Interest Group

D	Lars SORHUS

1	Current OIC Webmaster

2	Developer Tender Information Management Service

3	Developer Small & Medium size Enterprises E-Business Management Services 

E	Larry WILSON

1	Department of Defence Information Security Consultant

2	Advise OIC on information security issues

3	Devise programs to test authenticity of information sources


We have evaluated the specifications and the documentation provided and are of the opinion
that:

1 	the current design topology of a centralized e-services and e-procurement will add 
	considerable cost for Local Government in the medium and long term with integration
	services

2 	The specification has not considered new community e-services that Local Government
	Agencies can provide for their Communities

3 	A fixed priced contract for suppliers is not realistic for the many new processes
	outlined in the Specification of Requirements. 

This opinion is based on:

1 	feedback from members who have been involved in the OIC Local Government Special 
	Interest Group [LZIG] for the last 2 years with backgrounds in a number of disciplines
	including Electronic Data Interchange, e-Procurement, e-Services and e-Mapping for 
	many years.

2	Interested parties who attended the three Lgov-NSW local-e tender review meetings on

	C	10 Dec 2002

	B	22 Nov 2002

	A	12 Nov 2002

3 	A review of tenders issued by Local Government, State and Federal Government over 
	the last two years on TIMS including:

	A	NSW DPWS ITS 2305 e-Services RFT

	B	Fed DEWRSB e-Commerce Initiative EOI 04 May 2001

	C	Selection of Local Government tenders published on TIMS

The Key points for consideration are:

1	DISTRIBUTED NETWORKED TOPLOGY

	The first and most important issue is that we do not believe that Centralised 
	e-Services and e-Procurement systems will provide the response expected by the 
	Council users and the rate-payers.

	A distributed Networked Topology is required rather than separated centralized 
	e-Services & e-Procurement modules.  An example is this Local Government
	information flow schematic 

	This topology would eliminate the problems of transferring information from the
	centralized e-Services & e-Procurement systems to the accounting systems of the 
	Rural Councils.

	This is a topology design that was developed for the Insurance Industry

	This topology was developed because of the requirement for historical information 
	on Claims and Payment records hence the development of the Branch Information 
	Administration System [BIAS] which encompassed Human Resource applications
	for Computer based training, Data Processing and Office Automation requirements.

	The concepts of BIAS with historical reference information is relative to not only 
	the Rural Councils but also to the Regional Organisations of Councils [ROCS].

	As Graeme Philipson pointed out in his article in the Sydney Morning Herald on 
	03 Dec 2002 presenting useful information has not developed over the last 50 years in 
	computing. 

	We agree with that but believe the reasons is that the original systems designs were
	pre-occupied with transaction processing and not historical comparative review as is 
	now preferred with new Enterprise Management Systems including Customer Relationship 
	Management [CRM].

	Hence with is why we have always developed e-Business applications that provided 
	graphical representation of comparative data.  Example include:

	A	from the Insurance Industry 

	1	Management Spreadsheet on Commercial Insurance

	2	Colour graphic comparison monthly figures"

	B	Analysis tenders from TIMS

	1	by 9 Industry Groups published over last 30 months

	2	by 11 Application Groups published over last 18 months
 

	We doubt that the Councils will be able to afford the costs of centralised computing
	systems to provide that type of information for feedback to the Rural Councils from a 
	centralized e-Services or e-Procurement systems

2 	NEW SERVICES WITH E-BUSINESS

	There are a number of new services that the Local Councils will be able to offer the 
	local Business Community. 

	These new services could include:

	A	Electronic Notary - as defined in the Legal Workshop of the TEDIS Conference

	B	Automated back-up for local Small & Medium size Enterprises [SMEs]

	C	Providing Community Electronic surveys and feedback


	At this stage the Local Government Agencies will be unaware of those services because 
	of lack of experience withe-Business hence the first step is to raise skill levels in 
	the community.

3 	RAISING SKILL LEVELS IN RURAL COMMUNITIES

	Centralised e-Services and e-Procurement Systems do not raise the skill Levels.  The 
	Local Councils have to increase their skill levels to be able to provide new services 
	to the Local Businesses.

	One of the members of the OIC is the IT Faculty of the University of Technology.  UTS is
	very keen for its graduates to have work experience and pass their knowledge onto the 
	Community hence the OIC submission will	include plans for graduates to visit the Rural
	Councils to assist train Local Government staff. 

NEXT STEPS

As there are a number of key issues with regard to e-Services and e-Business that are not 
addressed by the Specification, we believe that the issue of whether a centralised e-services
and e-procurement or de-centralised should be reconsidered first with a number of benchmarks
performed to evaluate response performance.

As an independent e-Business Association members of the OIC Local Government Special Interest
Group would be prepared to develop and conduct a series of benchmarks for Lgov-NSW.

A number of members have indicated that they would be prepared to work with Lgov-NSW on a 
reduced joint-venture fee basis.

Yours sincerely

Guy BLOMBERG
Chair
OIC LZIG Technical Committee
OPEN INTERCHANGE CONSORTIUM
2002/12/16  17:53 	Qld 4215

E:	guy.blomberg@oic.org
T:	(02) 9966-5341
W:	http://www.oic.org/3a4h1.htm

























Revised: S: 16:46 Mon 16/12/2002 Qld 4125
F: 19:22 Mon 16/12/2002 Qld 4125
Who: gmb
Authorised: crh
Created: 16:46 Wed 20/02/2002 Lon TW12 1QB
By: rs
Revision: 2C9ACCN1.004
Original Page: 3a4h
Change date:
Who:
Authorised: