Article published Monday, November
6, 2006 Oregon bullish for funds to
secure landfill Town wants more bankrolled
to maintain site after it closes
Envirosafe Services has
operated Ohio's only licensed hazardous waste
disposal site since 1991. The landfill in Oregon
is permitted to accept the wastes until Dec. 29,
2015. The company has a perpetual care trust
fund of about $53 million to maintain the site
after it closes, but city officials say more
funding may be needed. ( THE BLADE/HERRAL LONG )
Barring
another extension, Envirosafe Services of Ohio
Inc. can't accept hazardous waste past Dec. 29,
2015, at the landfill it operates at Otter Creek
and Cedar Point roads in Oregon.
Not so clear is whether
Envirosafe has bankrolled enough money to keep its
facility from polluting water that flows into
western Lake Erie's ecologically sensitive Maumee
Bay.
Oregon officials fear they
someday could inherit that massive responsibility.
They're urging the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency to make the company commit every nickel it
can for long-term cleanup and maintenance of the
site.
The dump is the only one in Ohio
commercially licensed to bury hazardous waste.
Though Envirosafe's perpetual
care trust fund now has an estimated $53 million,
Oregon officials fear the company has
underestimated its future costs.
Ohio EPA auditors figure the fund
has about a $17 million cushion, or surplus.
Oregon takes issue with the company's current $36
million estimate for closure and post-closure
work.
The agency doesn't.
At the discretion of the Ohio EPA
director, the agency lets Envirosafe use some of
the money to pay for site investigation and other
work, said Ed Lim, manager of the agency's
hazardous waste management division.
So the question lingers: Is the
Ohio EPA being prudent and fair to both sides?
Mr. Lim acknowledged the
predicament. Envirosafe will need millions of
dollars to close down the landfill and suck
contaminated leachate out of all of its cells,
possibly for decades. It needs to install at least
two more landfill caps, then maintain those and
all others so that they don't degrade and allow
rainwater back into the pits.
Budgeting money for such work is
about as clear as gazing into a crystal ball and
predicting the future, Mr. Lim said.
"These are all value judgments.
Nobody has the right answer or the wrong answer,"
he said.
The money will come from a fund
Envirosafe established with $11 million in 1991 as
part of its permit negotiations with the state.
Investments have brought the figure up to $53
million.
Oregon officials believe any
perceived surplus should be off-limits until costs
are firmed up.
"The notion [that] this is
surplus money is not accurate," said Tom Hays,
assistant city law director, who said the Ohio EPA
needs to have more money "tagged and earmarked."
He did not say how much. But he
said the company needs to dedicate more money for
anything from replacing worn-out pumps to
addressing oily residue on the site.
The Ohio EPA renewed Envirosafe's
permit for 10 years on Dec. 29, 2005.
Another renewal is possible,
although Envirosafe President Doug Roberts said he
figures the dump's only active disposal pit,
called Cell M, is down to six to nine years of
capacity.
Mr. Roberts said Envirosafe isn't
going anywhere.
The company is committed to
treating hazardous waste on-site and is "always
looking at options" for opening up sites for
disposal, he said.
"I'm not sure whether we will
expand or build new landfill space, but we'll be
operating the treatment plant [where metals are
stabilized] as long as we can," Mr. Roberts said.
Leachate is the watery, chemical
mix that forms when rainwater penetrates
landfills.
Robust, modern landfill caps are
engineered to be impermeable. Their degree of
success is debated.
While Mr. Roberts sees a day in
which leachate will dissipate to virtually
nothing, Oregon officials disagree.
In an Oct. 13 letter to Joe
Koncelik, Ohio EPA director, Oregon Mayor Marge
Brown said she was "shocked" to learn that Mr. Lim
and Lynn Ackerson, the agency's site coordinator,
believe 18 years is a "reasonable" time frame for
calculating Envirosafe's remaining financial
obligation for three sites operated by the former
Fondessy Enterprises Inc.
Those sites, called the Millard
Avenue Landfill, Central Sanitary Landfill, and
Northern Sanitary Landfill, held a mixture of
household and industrial wastes. They date back to
1954 and were not lined. Envirosafe inherited them
when it acquired the landfill in 1983.
Thirty years is the standard
assessment period, though Mr. Lim said it's
somewhat arbitrary. The obligation is not fixed in
time; it depends solely on when leachate chemicals
have broken down to the point of being
inconsequential, Mr. Lim said.
Ms. Brown said in her letter
there is "no evidence that this toxic leachate
will be harmless to Otter Creek and Lake Erie in
18 years. There is plenty of evidence that
Envirosafe will be gone in 18 years, leaving the
burden to our community."
The sites are near Otter Creek,
which flows into western Lake Erie. The lake's
western basin is the backbone of the region's
multibillion-dollar fishing and boating
industries, in addition to being the raw source of
drinking water for Toledo and other communities.
Mr. Lim said officials in Oregon
have misunderstood the agency's intent.
The old Fondessy pits were closed
before the modern era of landfill regulations
began in 1984, when amendments to the national
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
gave the U.S. EPA its authority to restrict
disposal of hazardous waste. Ohio and other states
were required from that point on to develop
strategies for addressing older landfills.
Envirosafe agreed in a September
accord with the Ohio EPA to reduce the fluid
buildup with leachate pumps.
The three former Fondessy pits
predate four of Envirosafe's cells that have been
closed since 1994: Pits known as Cell F, Cell G,
Cell H, and Cell I. Leachate has been pumped out
of the latter four for the last 12 years.
Mr. Lim said the Ohio EPA simply
is trying to streamline its own bureacracy by
putting most pits on the same review schedule over
the next 18 years. Cell M will be assessed
separately.
Oregon officials claim the state
EPA is being too lenient.
Mr. Lim conceded the sites are
unlikely to be rendered harmless in 18 years.
Results on leachate extracted from Cells F, G, H,
and I show little sign of improvement in 12 years,
he said.
Ms. Brown said Oregon could be in
trouble "if we don't stay on top of it and force
the issue.
"Like anything else, it's a money
game," she said.
Contact Tom Henry at:
thenry@theblade.com or 419-724-6079.